| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> This wouldn't have to be because you have a vested interest in paludis |
| 6 |
>> and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no |
| 7 |
>> reasonable way to support that? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Cut the conspiracy theories. Paludis will support whatever PMS says it |
| 11 |
> should support. Released versions supported what PMS said at that time |
| 12 |
> (which went in line with the Portage documentation), and the next |
| 13 |
> release will support whatever PMS says then (which currently goes |
| 14 |
> against the Portage documentation, but along with Portage behaviour). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
Ciaran, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You missed the bandwagon on trying to use the "conspiracy theories" |
| 20 |
phrase already. That happened a full 24 hrs ago. I'm sorry you were |
| 21 |
off-line. Next time try to come to the party on time, otherwise keep quiet. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives