| 1 |
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 |
| 2 |
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> This wouldn't have to be because you have a vested interest in paludis |
| 4 |
> and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no |
| 5 |
> reasonable way to support that? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Cut the conspiracy theories. Paludis will support whatever PMS says it |
| 8 |
should support. Released versions supported what PMS said at that time |
| 9 |
(which went in line with the Portage documentation), and the next |
| 10 |
release will support whatever PMS says then (which currently goes |
| 11 |
against the Portage documentation, but along with Portage behaviour). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives