| 1 |
Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> [CC'ing council@g.o as requested by GLEP amendment from March 8th, 2007] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A subset of council members decided today that multiple version suffixes |
| 7 |
> are illegal in the tree pending further notice. This decission can be |
| 8 |
> appealed at the next Council meeting. If there is sufficient public |
| 9 |
> demand, an earlier meeting can be held. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This decission has been made to prevent sufficient precedence for |
| 12 |
> unilateral changes to the tree structure. So far the following package |
| 13 |
> versions are considered illegal: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> media-viode/mplayer-1.0_rc2_pre20070321-r4 |
| 16 |
> media-video/transcode-1.0.3_rc2_p20070310-r1 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> An illegal version specification of media-sound/alsa-driver has already |
| 19 |
> been removed from the tree. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I would like to ask the affected package maintainers to move these |
| 22 |
> versions to sane version specifications as soon as possible. Thanks in |
| 23 |
> advance for this. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Danny |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision and it |
| 29 |
be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeting. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Danny, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
This wouldn't have to be because you have a vested interest in paludis |
| 34 |
and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no |
| 35 |
reasonable way to support that? |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives