| 1 |
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 22:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:06:39 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | On Tuesday 16 November 2004 16:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> | > GWN and gentoo-announce would be a good idea. Right now |
| 7 |
> | > gentoo-announce is basically just used for GLSAs, it's not a |
| 8 |
> | > general announcement kind of thing at all. |
| 9 |
> | |
| 10 |
> | As long as the mail send to it is filtered some way I think we should |
| 11 |
> | start using gentoo-announce for these things. Similarly for an |
| 12 |
> | upgrade to gcc-3.4 (if we ever will) as it will break seriously if |
| 13 |
> | you're not carefull. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Noooo, see, that one's an arch issue, and so it should go to the |
| 16 |
> gentoo-x86 mailing list that our x86 arch team set up. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Oh, wait, you mean x86 released without meeting all the officially |
| 19 |
> supported rules and didn't get moved into experimental, despite what |
| 20 |
> was decided at the manager's meeting? *sigh* |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It's like the European Calculation Office for the (I believe) 11th year in |
| 23 |
a row not signing of the budget proposed by the European comittee, and |
| 24 |
the parliament still giving the Ok. The parliament could not give the OK |
| 25 |
and start a lot of mayhem, but what would it serve? It's also not the |
| 26 |
current comittee that can be blamed (they started two weeks ago). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Paul |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 32 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 33 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 34 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives