| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 5 |
| All of those of course are true. I guess I'm thinking more in the large |
| 6 |
| picture of things. Retiring non-active devs isn't something I'd exactly |
| 7 |
| call 'ground breaking' :-). I know there are things being worked on now |
| 8 |
| that will probably be in that category. I was mainly looking at the long |
| 9 |
| term flow of ground breaking progress we've made. Sure, we've made lots |
| 10 |
| of great improvements, but I'm concerned that we have too many |
| 11 |
| subprojects all working in their little world and no one really looking |
| 12 |
| over the whole project making sure things flow together well. There's no |
| 13 |
| one out there who's responsibility is to track all these subprojects and |
| 14 |
| make sure things are flowing right. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Shouldn't that be the council's job? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
| I dunno, I just get the impression that people fear having a goal to |
| 19 |
| work on and would rather just let things work out in a random way (like |
| 20 |
| they have been for a while now). I'm not wanting to take the fun out of |
| 21 |
| this, but I feel more structure and less redtape would help make us move |
| 22 |
| forward faster and better. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
More structure and less red tape ... How do those two work together? I |
| 25 |
feel like they're connected -- a more structured organization will have |
| 26 |
more bureaucracy and more red tape. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Thanks, |
| 29 |
Donnie |
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iD8DBQFDuuAIXVaO67S1rtsRAuEtAJ0c+WO0EGbIURhk+LQFl/sKp938/wCdFqJU |
| 34 |
i8ID3a3B/FoAq1FVFzlNjLw= |
| 35 |
=OxkM |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives