| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +0000, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Joonas Niilola wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, |
| 6 |
> > > https://packages.gentoo.org/ |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I had not seen that - that's wonderful! |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I would just request that /packages/ is removed from the start of |
| 11 |
> > package URLs. I understand how this makes request routing more |
| 12 |
> > complicated, but I consider it a significant usability improvement. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > ..anyway: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > > I'm suggesting of adding a new metadata flag to our Wiki's |
| 18 |
> > > User:/Project: page which then prints a message to this page saying |
| 19 |
> > > whether the maintainer (be it project or user), "accepts" or "deals |
| 20 |
> > > with" Github contributions. The wording can be a bit better, but it'd be |
| 21 |
> > > there to **notify** our **contributors** whether their time and effort |
| 22 |
> > > will most likely be wasted making a pull request for this particular |
| 23 |
> > > maintainer. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > I think this is a very good feature. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > If I ever do become a proper Gentoo developer I will certainly not spend |
| 28 |
> > any time on anything to do with GitHub, and in my current position of |
| 29 |
> > occasional contributor I don't either. The workflow imposed by GitHub |
| 30 |
> > isn't good and it's important to demonstrate other methods. |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Read: it's important to slap users to satisfy developer's wannabes. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
This sentence makes no sense, but it seems to be saying something rude. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Would you like to clarify? |
Archives