Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:48:10
Message-Id: 50a456187f3ab1ef9f64fb5dbbab1b99f716f3e2.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag by Peter Stuge
1 On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +0000, Peter Stuge wrote:
2 > Joonas Niilola wrote:
3 > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page,
4 > > https://packages.gentoo.org/
5 >
6 > I had not seen that - that's wonderful!
7 >
8 > I would just request that /packages/ is removed from the start of
9 > package URLs. I understand how this makes request routing more
10 > complicated, but I consider it a significant usability improvement.
11 >
12 >
13 > ..anyway:
14 >
15 > > I'm suggesting of adding a new metadata flag to our Wiki's
16 > > User:/Project: page which then prints a message to this page saying
17 > > whether the maintainer (be it project or user), "accepts" or "deals
18 > > with" Github contributions. The wording can be a bit better, but it'd be
19 > > there to **notify** our **contributors** whether their time and effort
20 > > will most likely be wasted making a pull request for this particular
21 > > maintainer.
22 >
23 > I think this is a very good feature.
24 >
25 > If I ever do become a proper Gentoo developer I will certainly not spend
26 > any time on anything to do with GitHub, and in my current position of
27 > occasional contributor I don't either. The workflow imposed by GitHub
28 > isn't good and it's important to demonstrate other methods.
29 >
30
31 Read: it's important to slap users to satisfy developer's wannabes.
32
33 --
34 Best regards,
35 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies