| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:27:19AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Only problem I see with this is binary packages. We can not control |
| 5 |
> > > upstream binaries as everyone is aware of. So when does it become safe |
| 6 |
> > > to override stable packages that have texrel's and executable stacks? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > no idea what you mean by "override", but here's a crazy idea ... ask |
| 9 |
> > upstream to fix the issues. for example, we just reported executable |
| 10 |
> > stacks with the ut2004 game and Ryan of epicgames was so kind as to |
| 11 |
> > fix it up for us. some upstream peeps dont even know about these sort |
| 12 |
> > of things until you point them out. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Let me take that back again. This is resolved on amd64, but not on x86. |
| 15 |
> There's 2 binaries. This also explains why I didn't see the error and |
| 16 |
> closed the bug, I'm on amd64, whereas the bug reporter is on x86. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
yeah, Ryan's one cool cat |
| 19 |
-mike |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives