| 1 |
On 20:42 Fri 05 Oct , Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> about 26 ebuilds have a PROVIDE=virtual/editor. Those could be |
| 3 |
> transformed to a new-style virtual, which is really simple. According |
| 4 |
> to zmedico and genone the impact of just commiting the virtual would |
| 5 |
> be low. But I'd like to hear some comments on it. If noone objects I |
| 6 |
> will commit it next week (Monday probably) and remove all PROVIDE |
| 7 |
> lines. Eventually I will check profiles, too, and file bugs when |
| 8 |
> unsure what the intended behaviour? Or anyone objections about me |
| 9 |
> touching his profiles. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at |
| 12 |
all? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
Donnie |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives