Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>
Cc: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@×××××.uk>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:18:49
Message-Id: 1062980533.8455.220.camel@nosferatu.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection by Jan Krueger
1 On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 03:50, Jan Krueger wrote:
2 > On Sunday 07 September 2003 23:41, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
3 > > This has been discussed before (
4 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5902 ). I think the gpg signatures
5 > > development got put on hold because there was talk of making individuals
6 > > responsible for packages (like Debian), rather than the system at the
7 > > moment where a small core does all of the work.
8 > Thank you for this information. Sounds good :)
9 > unfortunatly i read it after i answered the mail of Jon Portnoy.
10 >
11
12 I thought this is what Jon have been saying (yes, he did not go
13 into that much specifics, but you did not seem to care, and rejected
14 it anyhow for some reason).
15
16
17 --
18
19 Martin Schlemmer
20 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
21 Cape Town, South Africa

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>