Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>
To: azarah@g.o
Cc: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@×××××.uk>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:27:48
Message-Id: 200309080233.18134.jk@microgalaxy.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection by Martin Schlemmer
1 On Monday 08 September 2003 00:22, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > > Thank you for this information. Sounds good :)
3 > > unfortunatly i read it after i answered the mail of Jon Portnoy.
4 >
5 > I thought this is what Jon have been saying
6 I did not read something about:
7
8 "making individuals responsible for packages (like Debian)"
9
10 or
11
12 "to use signatures along with the concept of requiring a
13 certain number of developers to "sign off" an ebuild. Its important that the
14 compromise of a single developer with cvs access shouldn't impact thousands
15 of users. Therefore, most packages should require two or more developer
16 signatures before they will be installed."
17
18 in the mail of Jon. Sorry.
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies