Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>
Cc: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@×××××.uk>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 00:59:11
Message-Id: 1062982955.8455.230.camel@nosferatu.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection by Jan Krueger
1 On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 04:33, Jan Krueger wrote:
2 > On Monday 08 September 2003 00:22, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
3 > > > Thank you for this information. Sounds good :)
4 > > > unfortunatly i read it after i answered the mail of Jon Portnoy.
5 > >
6 > > I thought this is what Jon have been saying
7 > I did not read something about:
8 >
9 > "making individuals responsible for packages (like Debian)"
10 >
11 > or
12 >
13 > "to use signatures along with the concept of requiring a
14 > certain number of developers to "sign off" an ebuild. Its important that the
15 > compromise of a single developer with cvs access shouldn't impact thousands
16 > of users. Therefore, most packages should require two or more developer
17 > signatures before they will be installed."
18 >
19 > in the mail of Jon. Sorry.
20 >
21
22 But you did not ask either.
23
24
25 --
26
27 Martin Schlemmer
28 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
29 Cape Town, South Africa

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-project Jan Krueger <jk@×××××××××××.net>