1 |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:12:27 +0300 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 04/30/2011 11:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
5 |
> > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html |
6 |
|
7 |
[..] |
8 |
|
9 |
> It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required |
10 |
> for removals. Removing an unused ebuild is not the same as making |
11 |
> changes to an ebuild. |
12 |
|
13 |
I have to disagree: |
14 |
|
15 |
BAD: . |
16 |
GOOD: Purge old ebuilds |
17 |
|
18 |
It's not really specific to the subject at hand, but it does /sort of/ |
19 |
tell you to write ChangeLog entries for removals. :) |
20 |
|
21 |
I agree with you that logging removals isn't needed as their absence is |
22 |
plain evidence. I do tend to log removals when there is a very good |
23 |
reason other than that the version has been superseded, like when a |
24 |
certain version kills kittens or has security issues. I agree with |
25 |
everyone else that policy should be clarified and that the devmanual |
26 |
needs to reflect policy. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
jer |