| 1 |
On 04/30/2011 11:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 04/30/2011 07:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> sources.gentoo.org is for that. ChangeLog is for users, and "old" is |
| 6 |
>> not useful information to them |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> So no, I won't start cluttering up ChangeLogs and I would prefer if |
| 9 |
>> others would stop it as well |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Individual developers (especially QA project members) should not be |
| 14 |
> ignoring policies when they feel like it. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> If you want to try and change the policy then put it on the agenda of |
| 19 |
> the next council meeting as there does not seem to be a consensus |
| 20 |
> backing your opinion. Until then everyone is expected to play by the rules. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Petteri |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
It no where in the link you provided mentions ChangeLog is required for |
| 26 |
removals. Removing an unused ebuild is not the same as making changes to |
| 27 |
an ebuild. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
We have no policy for logging removals. And that's like it should be. |
Archives