1 |
This sounds to me exactly as the error means: |
2 |
gnome2.2 is stable but some of the dependancies aren't so if you want to |
3 |
update to gnome2.2 you have either to accept beta packages or stream |
4 |
down the gnome2.2 if you can mask out one or some other package from the |
5 |
dependancy list. |
6 |
|
7 |
Since gnome2.2 should be some kind of virtual package it shouldn't be |
8 |
stable until all of its dependancies are. So this also could be |
9 |
understood as an error. |
10 |
|
11 |
BUT ! The dependancies might vary by change of use flags. So gnome2.2 |
12 |
could be called stable once all possible use variations that effect its |
13 |
dependancy tree will also mask completly stable. |
14 |
|
15 |
This sounds like a hard rule for a real intelligent software. |
16 |
|
17 |
At least it turns out that YOU are the most intelligent part in that |
18 |
process, so you have to tune on that error, not your software. I fear |
19 |
that you have to accept that gnome2.2 isn't stable for you yet, so you |
20 |
should mask itself out with ~x86 (in you personal portage tree) or |
21 |
accept beta packages at least to emerge -u gnome. |
22 |
|
23 |
But that's only my opinion: I would vote against calling this an error |
24 |
actually. |
25 |
|
26 |
BYE INGO |
27 |
|
28 |
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:46:23AM -0800, Alan wrote: |
29 |
> Just wondering if gnome 2.2 is supposed to be in stable or not? I |
30 |
> notice that the main gnome package is updated to 2.2 (on x86) but many |
31 |
> of the dependancies (gst-plugins, gstreamer, etc) are still tagged as |
32 |
> ~x86, and are giving me errors like the following when I try an update |
33 |
> world: |
34 |
> |
35 |
> phoenix alan # emerge world -up |
36 |
> |
37 |
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Calculating world dependencies \ |
40 |
> !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=media-libs/gst-plugins-0.6.0-r1" |
41 |
> have been masked. |
42 |
> !!! (dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-2.2-r1" [ebuild]) |
43 |
> phoenix alan # |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Is this something that should be bugged, an oversight, or am I coming in |
46 |
> the middle of the transition and should wait a bit before trying? |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Another possibility is that my portage tree is messed up somehow, but |
49 |
> several emerge syncs give me the same result. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> TIA |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Alan |
54 |
> |
55 |
> -- |
56 |
> Alan <alan@×××××.org> - http://arcterex.net |
57 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
58 |
> "The only thing that experience teaches us is that experience teaches |
59 |
> us nothing. -- Andre Maurois (Emile Herzog) |
60 |
> |
61 |
> -- |
62 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
63 |
> |
64 |
> |
65 |
|
66 |
----- End forwarded message ----- |
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |