| 1 |
Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 16:26 -0500 schrieb Steev Klimaszewski: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Thoughts? Helps? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Afaik we have 3 types of arches: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
- experimental |
| 9 |
They are not CCed on stablization bugs and don't do stablizations at |
| 10 |
all. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
~mips, ~sparc-fbsd and ~x86-fbsd |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- unsupported |
| 15 |
They are CCed on stablizations bugs, but they are not supported by the |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux Security Project. It may take quite long until they |
| 17 |
actually do the stablization. But I'm also wondering why some of their |
| 18 |
profiles are marked as "dev". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
arm, ia64, m68k, sh, s390 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- supported |
| 23 |
Most popular arches, supported by the Gentoo Linux Security Project, |
| 24 |
they usually do your stablizations in time unless it requires some |
| 25 |
exotic hardware(the devs/ats don't have) to test. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
alpha, amd64, hppa, sparc, ppc, ppc64, x86 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Sources: |
| 30 |
- commits logs |
| 31 |
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/vulnerability-policy.xml |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Cheers, |
| 34 |
Friedrich |
Archives