Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:56:57
Message-Id: 20060517153920.GD10815@aerie.halcy0n.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles by Matthijs van der Vleuten
1 Matthijs van der Vleuten <zr40.nl@×××××.com> said:
2 > I'd say that's exactly the intention of INVALID. If I were to file,
3 > say, a bug in GCC at Gentoo's Bugzilla instead of GCC's, it would be
4 > marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's
5 > patches.)
6
7 No, I would get a testcase for the bug and file it upstream. The only
8 bugs I've marked invalid are for the testing versions of GCC.
9
10 But, this is entirely off topic.
11
12 --
13 Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
14 email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
15 mark AT halcy0n DOT com
16 web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
17 http://www.halcy0n.com