Re: Gentoo and Github (Re: [gentoo-dev] Attracting developers (Re: Packages up for grabs...) )

[Diego Elio Pettenò]

We are.

Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/


On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >>> On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote:
> >>> > Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some "Inbound"
> repository
> >>> > until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted
> people
> >>> > can review submitted branches and apply them to CVS?
> >>>
> >>> This is why I started https://github.com/yngwin/proxy-maint/
> >>> Feel free to send pull requests my way. I have been very busy lately
> >>> with work, so I am a bit behind on my Gentoo stuff, but I should be
> back
> >>> in full swing soon.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not to sidetrack the topic farther, but isn't this best done in our
> >> github/gentoo account.  It is one of the main reasons we have it, to
> >> easily accept pull requests from users.  It would also make it easier
> >> for more devs to participate in a group proxy-maint repo.
> >
> > Certainly a sidetrack: I would like to point out that Github now
> > supports "Organizations" as a semantic concept. I *highly* recommend
> > using something like that over using an 'individual' account as an
> > organization.
> >
> > I've been using Github "Organizations" in a private context, and it's
> > been working extremely well.
>
> Ugh. Apologies. I meant to change the subject line, spent a couple
> minutes figuring out how to do it in GMail...and then forgot. :-|
>
> Fixing...
>
> --
> :wq
>
>