From: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | ||
Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:03:50 | ||
Message-Id: | CAJ0EP41SMi26bK_i3sJmpb2MHkY8nX9Ry80q3NLuMWYaptMJVQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > On 12/10/2013 09:18 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: |
3 | >> |
4 | >> I'd say go one step further and get rid of vixie-cron completely, is |
5 | >> there anything it does that cronie can't do as well or better? |
6 | > |
7 | > Is cronie a drop-in replacement, or do I have to do some thinking when |
8 | > replacing vixie-cron? |
9 | > |
10 | |
11 | It should be a drop-in. The only change to make would be to remove |
12 | vixie-cron and add cronie to the default runlevel. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |