Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: the proposal
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:25:31
Message-Id: 449EEF59.9040908@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: the proposal by George Shapovalov
1 George Shapovalov wrote:
2 > sci-biology: 58
3 > rather large, may be worth splitting more, no particular suggestions yet
4 > though, devs:
5 > ribosome, blubb, corsair, j4rg0n, mcummings, sediener, pbienst, apokorny,
6 > hansmi?, phosphan, lostlogic?
7
8 i'm not maintaining anything, just keywording it for amd64. wouldn't it be
9 easier to only list people that are in the sci herd?
10
11 > sci-misc: 19
12 > Size is Ok, but, if we follow the idea, should probably stay under sci (herd)
13 > devs:
14 > cryos, hansmi?, phosphan, ribosome, kugelfang?, pbienst, blubb?
15
16 same here
17
18 --
19 Kind Regards,
20
21 Simon Stelling
22 Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Scientific Gentoo reorg: the proposal George Shapovalov <george@g.o>