| 1 |
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:18:43 -0500 |
| 2 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Forgive me if this is just noise, but I just wanted to say I agree |
| 5 |
> fully with ferdy. As I was reading Roy's email, and I looked at the |
| 6 |
> net config sample he had in there, I thought "well, what's actually |
| 7 |
> wrong with this?" |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Cannot be parsed by shells other than bash or zsh |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Keeping it as is has the advantage that an |
| 13 |
> upgrade/downgrade cycle wouldn't change much in functionality based on |
| 14 |
> config, which is pretty good (ie, backwards compatibility). In this |
| 15 |
> case, I'm not sure legacy is all that bad, simply because it's |
| 16 |
> expressive and concise and easily understood :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So you're saying we patch other shells to support bash arrays? |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives