Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jano Lukac <jano@××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos questions
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:19:09
Message-Id: 39581.10.10.220.33.1020788025.squirrel@www.portablehole.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos questions by Dave Love
1 Groovy on the kerberos stuff! Finally someone else interested in it :)
2
3 Quick thing.. why the skey use? And isn't kerberos 4 "outdated" now, so
4 almost as if saying, "why bother" ?
5
6 Dave Love said:
7 <snip>
8
9 > 3. I've then started adding new dependencies for the various
10 > utilities, such as cyrus-sasl:
11 >
12 > dev/libs/cyrus-sasl/cyrus-sasl-1.5.27-r1.ebuild:
13 >
14 > DEPEND="... kerberos4? ( virtual/kerberos4 ) kerberos5? (
15 > virtual/kerberos5 )"
16 >
17 > src_compile() {
18 > local myconf
19 > use kerberos4 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-krb4"
20 > use kerberos4 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-krb4"
21 > use kerberos5 && myconf="${myconf} --enable-gssapi"
22 > use kerberos5 || myconf="${myconf} --disable-gssapi"
23
24
25 I think you might be able to shorten this to the use foo && bar || that,
26 but probably kills the readability and might cause a line wrap *shrug*.
27 BTW, with the above, I'm assuming you can have both kerberos 4 and 5
28 compiled into sasl (but I think I remember you cannot).
29
30
31 > ...
32 >
33 > Am I on the right track here? It seems to work, but I want to
34 > make certain I'm headed in the right direction before I go much
35 > further.
36
37 Looks like it. If kerberos 4 and 5 cannot coexist, then make a single
38 virtual depend, or just don't do the virtual depend.
39
40 jano

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos questions Dave Love <dlove@××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kerberos questions jboyens@××××××××.org