| 1 |
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Wednesday 23 November 2005 02:18, Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>Hello everyone, |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised |
| 9 |
>>about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>So, i wrote a script to try to get a list of those orphaned entries, |
| 12 |
>>and it looks like there are more than 400 packages/ebuilds which are still |
| 13 |
>>listed in p.m but that don't exist in the tree anymore. |
| 14 |
>>(A bunch of them from the KDE herd btw) |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>I am not seeing the packages for the KDE herd - are you accounting for >=? KDE |
| 19 |
>3.5 packages are just coming out of rcs, and alpha was long since removed but |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>>=alpha1 is package.masked - I am also using this for digikam packages. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yes. The script only checks for non-existent ebuilds. |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives