| 1 |
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:04:45 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> It will be available once you trigger again the generation or if |
| 4 |
> >> you put a normal ebuild with such name. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > And what triggers said generation? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I already replied in this thread, I guess the information is getting |
| 9 |
> too spread (and will be a pain put it back to the glep) =/ |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> dev-zero pointed out that he would like to trigger the generation on |
| 12 |
> a timely basis, I wanted to trigger it on the sync event, others had |
| 13 |
> other opinion, so the best would be have it as separate phase and |
| 14 |
> trigger it from the maint application. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And none of those are even close to a reasonable, implementable idea. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm getting the impression you really didn't think this through at all |
| 19 |
before mailing your proposal. I suggest you go back to the start, work |
| 20 |
out use cases, package manager interactions, how if at all ebuilds will |
| 21 |
need to be adapted and several examples. There's a big difference |
| 22 |
between a few vague ideas and the foundations for an implementable |
| 23 |
proposal. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives