| 1 |
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100 |
| 2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we |
| 5 |
> > are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't |
| 6 |
> > define the term [2]. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be |
| 9 |
> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both |
| 10 |
> components. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
How about "atoms". We've been using that for ages (regardless of what |
| 13 |
PMS authors think) so why change it now? Alternatively, I would propose |
| 14 |
to call them "bikesheds" as that will work just as well as any other |
| 15 |
label and will succinctly refer to the creative process that made it |
| 16 |
a replacement for "atoms". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
jer |
Archives