| 1 |
Christian Hartmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Feedback is highly appreciated. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Feedback: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think the first sentence should say "staff" rather than "developer": |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
"Global moderators and site admins should also go through the mentoring |
| 11 |
process and become official Gentoo developers." |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Overall it sounds like a good idea as far as QA goes. I think this will |
| 14 |
be your biggest obstacle: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"Recent events such as the election of trustees or the new metastructure |
| 17 |
poll are effectively affecting the forums, so the wish to be part of the |
| 18 |
decision as an equal member is present among the moderators." |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
How exactly did recent voting affect the forums and why should |
| 21 |
Foundation members vote to give you voting rights because of what is |
| 22 |
affecting the forums? (Assuming Foundation members would have to |
| 23 |
vote to change who can vote). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Its arguable that moderators being non-staff is a good thing because its |
| 26 |
non-staff essentially censoring and deleting other non-staff in the |
| 27 |
forums, so make a good case ;) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
"Forums don't really seem to fit into one of the current categories as |
| 30 |
they are related to the infrastructure and the documentation project. We |
| 31 |
suggest putting it in the other category or making a separate one for |
| 32 |
the forums." |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Seems like you'd fit perfectly under User Relations, wherever they fall |
| 35 |
under the toplevel project structure. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Rob Cakebread |
| 39 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 40 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96BA679B |
| 41 |
Key fingerprint = 5E1A 57A0 0FA6 939D 3258 8369 81C5 A17B 96BA 679B |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives