| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:25:08 +0100 |
| 2 |
"George Prowse" <cokehabit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Why risk anything by changing the tree to suit the package? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
We're not risking anything, except upsetting a few people. We're not |
| 7 |
changing anything either, just adding a few files. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> It just |
| 10 |
> seems like asking for trouble. The overlay ability is there for a |
| 11 |
> reason. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes, to work around a lack of multiple repository support. It's not |
| 14 |
there to try to mix profiles between repositories. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Paludis isn't being used and should be kept out of the sphere |
| 17 |
> of users use until it is usable, wont break systems and is |
| 18 |
> trustworthy enough to be near the tree |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It is, it is, it won't unless the user screws up (as with, say, |
| 21 |
Portage), and it is. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives