1 |
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:25 -0600 |
2 |
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +0000 |
5 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100 |
8 |
> > Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2) |
10 |
> > > > ----- |
11 |
> > > > EAPI=1 |
12 |
> > > > inherit myeclass |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Invalid |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I didn't think it was a brainy thing to do, but I can't find anything |
19 |
> saying it isn't allowed. It probably shouldn't be. |
20 |
|
21 |
Ah now i did. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
25 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
26 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |