| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 14:16 +0100, Patrick Börjesson wrote: |
| 2 |
[snip] |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> It seems that INSTALL_MASK works only at merge time, so that if you |
| 5 |
> build a package at one machine (with INSTALL_MASK set to f.ex. |
| 6 |
> /usr/share/doc) and install it on the same machine, you get the expected |
| 7 |
> behaviour. But the INSTALL_MASK:ed directories and their contents are |
| 8 |
> still present in the binary package since they're not filtered out until |
| 9 |
> the merge-step. So if you then want to merge this package on a different |
| 10 |
> machine, and forget to set INSTALL_MASK you still get everything |
| 11 |
> originally present under /usr/share/doc installed. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> One might argue that INSTALL_MASK should apply for |
| 14 |
> binary-package-building also, but so is not the case at the moment. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives