| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > > >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? best-networking? |
| 12 |
> > > > > |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if |
| 15 |
> > > the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during |
| 16 |
> > > previous discussions). |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Hmm, that is a little too cryptic maybe... Is gen "Gentoo? General? |
| 19 |
> > Generic?" |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> OK. that was the point like mgorny said. To keep Gentoo out of the name |
| 23 |
> so it is more likely to be picked up by other distros due to it's ease |
| 24 |
> of use and flexibility. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Since it is so flexible and handle so many configurations... |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> How about Multi-net? ;) (just one more for the fray...) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
:p |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
William |
Archives