Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: robbat2@g.o, cardoe@g.o, dolsen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 03:24:12
Message-Id: 20130805032359.GA14181@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet by Brian Dolbec
1 On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2 > On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 15:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > > Doug and Brian, I'm going to reply in a little more detail.
4 > >
5 > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
6 > > > On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 21:03 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
7 > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
8 > > > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 01:49:46AM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
9 > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:38 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
10 > > >
11 > > > > >> OK... so gentoo-networking? or just come up with own name? best-networking?
12 > > > > >
13 > > >
14 > > > How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if
15 > > > the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during
16 > > > previous discussions).
17 > >
18 > > Hmm, that is a little too cryptic maybe... Is gen "Gentoo? General?
19 > > Generic?"
20 >
21 >
22 > OK. that was the point like mgorny said. To keep Gentoo out of the name
23 > so it is more likely to be picked up by other distros due to it's ease
24 > of use and flexibility.
25 >
26 > Since it is so flexible and handle so many configurations...
27 >
28 > How about Multi-net? ;) (just one more for the fray...)
29
30 :p
31
32 I'm actually thinking netrc if Robin is ok with it.
33
34 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com>