| 1 |
My personal opinion is, wouldn't there be a guy like RMS, there |
| 2 |
shouldn't be any hesitation in declaring everything part of the GNU project. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
But as long as anybody's software is part of a campaign against |
| 5 |
everything which is not GNU, I have big problems with it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Fredrik Jagenheim wrote: |
| 10 |
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 02:57:14PM +0200, Alexander Gretencord wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>Well for some ppl now that someone tried to push the GNU/ part onto Gentoo |
| 13 |
>>it's this kind of "no, not after this" feeling :) This doesn't bring us |
| 14 |
>>anywhere it's not the users decision anyway. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Oh, but let's make it a users decision. I propose a new flag in USE |
| 19 |
> that will let the user name the system 'GNU/Linux' or 'Linux' or |
| 20 |
> 'Gentoo GNU/Linux, the best dist for politically correct power users'. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Now, let's flame over what the default should be. ;) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> No, I'm not serious. Unless it's about code. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> //Humming, pondering if he's naming it GNU/Linux because he used GNU |
| 27 |
> tools to build it, should he then name his Great Novel after the |
| 28 |
> typewriter? ;) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 31 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 32 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 33 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 34 |
> |
Archives