| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:31:20 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Hi, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> over the course of the years the x86 (and other architectures as well) |
| 8 |
>> has given away permissions to maintainers/teams to mark packages |
| 9 |
>> stable themselves. As there never was a definitive list what |
| 10 |
>> exceptions exist, I compiled a list of the ones I could get from the |
| 11 |
>> top of my head in [1]. Please yell if you have those |
| 12 |
>> permissions so I can complete the list for reference purposes. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> V-Li |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/x86/exceptions.xml |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> sys-libs/timezone-data |
| 19 |
> most of app-doc (ie. anything installing just docs or text) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I'd also like permission to stabilize fonts ourselves once they've cleared |
| 22 |
> amd64 and x86. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense |
| 27 |
> toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime |
| 28 |
> @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Yeah, do whatever you want for Alpha and MIPS. I doubt anyone is going |
| 32 |
to have any problems for any other architectures either. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Matt |
Archives