| 1 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:05:44 -0600 Jason Huebel <jhuebel@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Thursday 31 March 2005 7:55 pm, Jason Huebel wrote: |
| 4 |
| > Now, If ciaranm is offering to make the massive changes required for |
| 5 |
| > this then maybe. Otherwise, it isn't happening anytime soon. |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| I recend the offer for ciaranm to do the changes if he feels like it. |
| 8 |
| That was, if you didn't catch it, sarcasm. But I'm not very good at |
| 9 |
| sarcasm. :-) |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| We've added the aforementioned note to our documentation explaining |
| 12 |
| why amd64 is the chosen keyword for the x86-64 arch. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hrm, I think the wording maybe isn't clear enough. What is proposed is |
| 15 |
that amd64 uses the x86 keyword. I've attached a revised version with |
| 16 |
that clarified -- I guess not everyone's aware of the specifics of the |
| 17 |
sparc merge so I made the purpose more explicit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
| 21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives