Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeff Smelser <tradergt@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 16:52:29
Message-Id: 200407101152.27257.tradergt@smelser.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.2.3 by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Saturday 10 July 2004 11:06 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
5 > Hi,
6 >
7 > I've followed this whole thread and you seem to be saying that you don't
8 > understand why non-KDE devs replied and why it was taken so negatively.
9 > Therefore, I'll explain how your original email was perceived (at least to
10 > me) so that perhaps you can see the other side of the fence. I could do
11 > this for every email you've sent, but I hope that you'll do it yourself.
12
13 Kurt and I want over this.
14
15 > On Saturday 10 July 2004 01:06, Jeff Smelser wrote:
16 > > Dev's,
17 > >
18 > > Its becoming increasingly common place these days for program to sit in
19 > > ~x86 for a long time.
20 >
21 > You've opened here addressing the entire developer-base of Gentoo. You've
22 > then gone on to say that we're all lazy.
23
24 Correct, this was before I knew of the 30 day policy.. I am not the only one
25 who see's it as this discussion has come up about every 3 months from what I
26 have heard from other dev's. Your assuming I said your lazy, thats partially
27 my fault for not being more clear, and yours for assuming. I should have
28 been more clear and they could have asked me to be more clear. Either way, I
29 will try to be more clear next time. ;) I never once said you guys are lazy,
30 I know your busy.
31
32 > > I am curious why this is?
33 >
34 > This sounds like an honest question on its own, but sounds very sarcastic
35 > in the context of the previous statement.
36
37 Emails are that way, its all left up for interpretation, if we were standing
38 face to face, this wouldn't have been the blow up that it was.
39
40 > > Kde 3.2.3 is still in testing. Whats taking so long?
41 >
42 > Again, fairly innocent question but, even on its own, it has a very
43 > self-centered overtone. In the context of what you wrote previously, it's
44 > just a personal attack on Gentoo's KDE maintainer(s).
45
46 It wasn't.. June 10 kde was released. I was just wondering why its not in the
47 stable tree yet, again, not knowing the 30 day "standard".
48
49 > > June 24 is a long time to test a production ready application, as kde
50 > > feels it is.
51 >
52 > This shows that the package in question has been in testing for a total of
53 > 16 days. This also shows that you haven't looked into what a dev's job is.
54
55 I was wrong, its June 10.. I read off the wrong date, my apologies for that..
56 its been roughly 30 days now. And I know what a dev's job is.
57
58 > In the context of the whole thread, i think those five words "as kde feels
59 > it is" might have been the whole point of your email - "why aren't releases
60 > that upstream believe to be stable considered stable by Gentoo?" If you had
61 > of asked that providing the context of KDE 3.2.3 being tested for 16 days,
62 > I guarantee you would have got a better respone.
63
64 your right.. I was wrong on that and I do admit it as I did with Kurt, it was
65 poorly constructed. I apologized then, as I do now. My intentions were to see
66 why kde hasn't been released, and help get it in faster, no matter what it
67 was.. Again, not knowing this 30 day rule.. I didn't think there was
68 considering some things are released early.
69
70 Mysql too, kde has been picked on but I mentioned it too.
71
72 > > There are other packages I have found I am having to force upgrading
73 > > myself on these days just to get.
74 >
75 > This has no merit what so ever to the question your asking or any point
76 > your trying to make and so just sounds like a whinge...
77 >
78 > > mysql is still on 4.018, they are on 20 now.
79
80 > ...and then you go on to make another personal attack on the mysql
81 > maintainer(s).
82
83 Why is this all taken personal? If I maintained mysql, and this was asked, I
84 would explain why its two versions behind.. I don't get this one..
85
86 Maybe the context of the message, protrays this.
87
88 > > Whats going on over there?
89 > > Jeff
90 >
91 > You then signoff by broadening your personal attack to include every Gentoo
92 > developer.
93
94 Again, as I said with Kurt, this was uncalled for, I agree. and I apologized
95 for it.
96
97 Like I said, I got off on the wrong foot, and I tried to explain my intentions
98 over and over but everyone just want to tell me how wrong I am. instead of
99 just shutting me up by proving that mysql shouldn't be released, and that kde
100 isn't in its 30 day stage yet. Instead, I got told I was a self serving ass
101 and so on.
102
103 Again, I have been here a long time.. Most should know me by now as I help in
104 gentoo-user all the time.. So i just didn't show up one day throwing my
105 weight around.. I should have replaced that last line with I want to help get
106 the release in, if possible.
107
108 Contrary to popular believe, I want gentoo to succeed. Kde is just as much of
109 a problem for me, as it is for you in this issue. It takes time for you to
110 send it out, and it takes time for me to get it installed if I want it early.
111 I was looking for a solution that could help both of us now, and in the
112 future. Thats all.
113
114 Jeff
115 - --
116 =======================================================================
117 Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org)
118 Quote: I will make spiritual bankruptcy my goal for the day.
119 =======================================================================
120 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
121 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
122
123 iD8DBQFA8B7Lld4MRA3gEwYRAsgGAJ9i63tv9G0TTjXQUUZcd/RfWS8kmwCgm0jb
124 iH481ctcjD5EhDZrDJ/Wt6U=
125 =V8f3
126 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
127
128 --
129 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list