1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Saturday 10 July 2004 11:06 am, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
5 |
> Hi, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I've followed this whole thread and you seem to be saying that you don't |
8 |
> understand why non-KDE devs replied and why it was taken so negatively. |
9 |
> Therefore, I'll explain how your original email was perceived (at least to |
10 |
> me) so that perhaps you can see the other side of the fence. I could do |
11 |
> this for every email you've sent, but I hope that you'll do it yourself. |
12 |
|
13 |
Kurt and I want over this. |
14 |
|
15 |
> On Saturday 10 July 2004 01:06, Jeff Smelser wrote: |
16 |
> > Dev's, |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Its becoming increasingly common place these days for program to sit in |
19 |
> > ~x86 for a long time. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> You've opened here addressing the entire developer-base of Gentoo. You've |
22 |
> then gone on to say that we're all lazy. |
23 |
|
24 |
Correct, this was before I knew of the 30 day policy.. I am not the only one |
25 |
who see's it as this discussion has come up about every 3 months from what I |
26 |
have heard from other dev's. Your assuming I said your lazy, thats partially |
27 |
my fault for not being more clear, and yours for assuming. I should have |
28 |
been more clear and they could have asked me to be more clear. Either way, I |
29 |
will try to be more clear next time. ;) I never once said you guys are lazy, |
30 |
I know your busy. |
31 |
|
32 |
> > I am curious why this is? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> This sounds like an honest question on its own, but sounds very sarcastic |
35 |
> in the context of the previous statement. |
36 |
|
37 |
Emails are that way, its all left up for interpretation, if we were standing |
38 |
face to face, this wouldn't have been the blow up that it was. |
39 |
|
40 |
> > Kde 3.2.3 is still in testing. Whats taking so long? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Again, fairly innocent question but, even on its own, it has a very |
43 |
> self-centered overtone. In the context of what you wrote previously, it's |
44 |
> just a personal attack on Gentoo's KDE maintainer(s). |
45 |
|
46 |
It wasn't.. June 10 kde was released. I was just wondering why its not in the |
47 |
stable tree yet, again, not knowing the 30 day "standard". |
48 |
|
49 |
> > June 24 is a long time to test a production ready application, as kde |
50 |
> > feels it is. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> This shows that the package in question has been in testing for a total of |
53 |
> 16 days. This also shows that you haven't looked into what a dev's job is. |
54 |
|
55 |
I was wrong, its June 10.. I read off the wrong date, my apologies for that.. |
56 |
its been roughly 30 days now. And I know what a dev's job is. |
57 |
|
58 |
> In the context of the whole thread, i think those five words "as kde feels |
59 |
> it is" might have been the whole point of your email - "why aren't releases |
60 |
> that upstream believe to be stable considered stable by Gentoo?" If you had |
61 |
> of asked that providing the context of KDE 3.2.3 being tested for 16 days, |
62 |
> I guarantee you would have got a better respone. |
63 |
|
64 |
your right.. I was wrong on that and I do admit it as I did with Kurt, it was |
65 |
poorly constructed. I apologized then, as I do now. My intentions were to see |
66 |
why kde hasn't been released, and help get it in faster, no matter what it |
67 |
was.. Again, not knowing this 30 day rule.. I didn't think there was |
68 |
considering some things are released early. |
69 |
|
70 |
Mysql too, kde has been picked on but I mentioned it too. |
71 |
|
72 |
> > There are other packages I have found I am having to force upgrading |
73 |
> > myself on these days just to get. |
74 |
> |
75 |
> This has no merit what so ever to the question your asking or any point |
76 |
> your trying to make and so just sounds like a whinge... |
77 |
> |
78 |
> > mysql is still on 4.018, they are on 20 now. |
79 |
|
80 |
> ...and then you go on to make another personal attack on the mysql |
81 |
> maintainer(s). |
82 |
|
83 |
Why is this all taken personal? If I maintained mysql, and this was asked, I |
84 |
would explain why its two versions behind.. I don't get this one.. |
85 |
|
86 |
Maybe the context of the message, protrays this. |
87 |
|
88 |
> > Whats going on over there? |
89 |
> > Jeff |
90 |
> |
91 |
> You then signoff by broadening your personal attack to include every Gentoo |
92 |
> developer. |
93 |
|
94 |
Again, as I said with Kurt, this was uncalled for, I agree. and I apologized |
95 |
for it. |
96 |
|
97 |
Like I said, I got off on the wrong foot, and I tried to explain my intentions |
98 |
over and over but everyone just want to tell me how wrong I am. instead of |
99 |
just shutting me up by proving that mysql shouldn't be released, and that kde |
100 |
isn't in its 30 day stage yet. Instead, I got told I was a self serving ass |
101 |
and so on. |
102 |
|
103 |
Again, I have been here a long time.. Most should know me by now as I help in |
104 |
gentoo-user all the time.. So i just didn't show up one day throwing my |
105 |
weight around.. I should have replaced that last line with I want to help get |
106 |
the release in, if possible. |
107 |
|
108 |
Contrary to popular believe, I want gentoo to succeed. Kde is just as much of |
109 |
a problem for me, as it is for you in this issue. It takes time for you to |
110 |
send it out, and it takes time for me to get it installed if I want it early. |
111 |
I was looking for a solution that could help both of us now, and in the |
112 |
future. Thats all. |
113 |
|
114 |
Jeff |
115 |
- -- |
116 |
======================================================================= |
117 |
Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) |
118 |
Quote: I will make spiritual bankruptcy my goal for the day. |
119 |
======================================================================= |
120 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
121 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
122 |
|
123 |
iD8DBQFA8B7Lld4MRA3gEwYRAsgGAJ9i63tv9G0TTjXQUUZcd/RfWS8kmwCgm0jb |
124 |
iH481ctcjD5EhDZrDJ/Wt6U= |
125 |
=V8f3 |
126 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
127 |
|
128 |
-- |
129 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |