| 1 |
Steve Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> "C. Bergström" wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Since there's a select few people here who feel it's their duty to keep |
| 5 |
>> posting non-technical discussion to this list. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> 1) Someone much more senior than me please step in and take a leader role. |
| 8 |
>> 2) Everyone wrapped up in please take a step back and see what's |
| 9 |
>> actually trying to be accomplished. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> Understood. Can I suggest we take the discussion to the user-reps forum or |
| 12 |
> even gentoo-chat? cokehabit you'd know which is more appropriate. |
| 13 |
Seeing as I created the rules for the userrep forum i doubt this would |
| 14 |
be allowed. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I so much want to write out a long list of things that are fundamentally |
| 17 |
wrong here but Seemant is quite correct in that I have made my point. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The damage to Gentoo seems irreparable and only by getting outside help |
| 20 |
will anything be done. It has already been shown that it is unable to |
| 21 |
fix it's own problems. I thought that the inclusion of Daniel would help |
| 22 |
but developers seemed more intent on letting him know that they were now |
| 23 |
his equal rather that wishing to do anything constructive. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives