1 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> said: |
2 |
> I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP |
3 |
> help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is |
4 |
> rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing |
5 |
> request. Since then I believe that lcars had taken LDAP over, or is |
6 |
> otherwise assisting robbat2 (or the LDAP team, if we have one now). In |
7 |
> any event, I doubt that I'm the only irresponsible dev who's added an |
8 |
> entry to the staffing-needs page and forgot about it, so perhaps we need |
9 |
> to have items expire unless explicitly renewed? Thoughts? |
10 |
|
11 |
I think this is a good idea. We have some items on there that are years |
12 |
old, and it would be good to even update the requested date on them so |
13 |
that people know the requests are still valid. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
17 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
18 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
19 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
20 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |