1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any points I |
4 |
> have left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should |
5 |
> there be a time window before removing baselayout-1? What about |
6 |
> between steps 1 and 2? What do you consider to be a reasonable time |
7 |
> window before we stop supporting migration from baselayout-1 to |
8 |
> baselayout-2/openrc? I'm thinking on the order of a few months, but |
9 |
> not years. |
10 |
|
11 |
We have a policy on this, see |
12 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt>: |
13 |
|
14 |
| Upgrade path for old systems |
15 |
| ---------------------------- |
16 |
| Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path to a |
17 |
| stable system that hasn't been updated for one year. |
18 |
|
19 |
So the time window should be at least one year after stabilisation of |
20 |
baselayout-2 and openrc. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ulrich |