From: | Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) | ||
Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:15:22 | ||
Message-Id: | BANLkTim1xkeNZFCdpphujLVfuc8o566DTg@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan) by Daniel Pielmeier |
1 | On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <billie@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > Corentin Chary schrieb am 18.04.2011 11:05: |
3 | >> |
4 | >> Fyi: I ran a new scan this morning. It only took 3 hours ! |
5 | >> |
6 | >> GNU's Parallel is really a great tool: |
7 | >> `python manage.py list-packages | gparallel --eta --progress --jobs |
8 | >> 400% euscan | python manage.py scan-upstream --feed > /dev/null` |
9 | >> |
10 | >> I'll try to implement charts as soon as I've got enought data. |
11 | > |
12 | > I really like it. Keep up the good work. It gives a warm and fuzzy |
13 | > feeling if there are no unpackaged releases for the own packages :) |
14 | > |
15 | > There is one issue I recognized. How do you get the links for the |
16 | > unpackaged upstream versions and do you verify if the listed tarballs |
17 | > exist? I am asking because for app-editors/bluefish [1] there are eleven |
18 | > unpackaged versions listed but only sources for the three 2.0.3 releases |
19 | > exist and there are no releases for 2.1.x and 2.2.x. |
20 | > |
21 | > http://euscan.iksaif.net/package/app-editors/bluefish/ |
22 | |
23 | For bluefish, it's because when you try to download |
24 | http://www.bennewitz.com/bluefish/stable/source/bluefish-2.2.3.tar.bz2 |
25 | it redirects you to an earlier version. |
26 | |
27 | Fixed here: http://git.iksaif.net/?p=euscan.git;a=commitdiff;h=d74b2c505619306ab1ce3d4af3f66084b4faeed9;hp=a7a15c0ac72178bf2f3a73f94a70113ed9856e5c |
28 | |
29 | Thanks ! |
30 | |
31 | -- |
32 | Corentin Chary |
33 | http://xf.iksaif.net |