Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:49:52
Message-Id: 7c612fc60702201447q1d4c40bcu7527787c1e229659@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 2/20/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote:
2 > This is standard practice for professional standards, and is the
3
4 Now you talk about this, a standard is, in standard practice, the
5 result of a collaborative effort of representing members of the
6 organization(s) that is (are) supposed to adhere to said standard. I
7 believe I don't need then to explain you how far what happens around
8 PMS is from standard practice.
9
10 You say you want to avoid endless discussions "in the interest of
11 getting it finished". Now, if your work is that good, why would there
12 be any discussions about it? If it's not good enough, why wouldn't you
13 let us talk about it and make it better? Also, if it goes in the wrong
14 direction, one that Gentoo devs won't follow, what's the point in
15 finishing it?
16
17 Denis.
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>