Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ssuominen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:07:08
Message-Id: 20120814160515.315075a9@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) by Samuli Suominen
1 On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
5 > > On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
6 > >> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
7 > >> even /bin. It shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific
8 > >> $libdir ,or lib64/.
9 > >
10 > > Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would be cleaner to
11 > > use /usr/libexec.
12 >
13 > I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff
14 > over /usr/lib/$pkg/ on "daily basis"
15
16 I believe we should be keeping «aligned» paths somewhere rather than
17 randomly moving stuff by hand. If you're saying that /usr/lib/${PN} ==
18 libexec, maybe we should put that into PMS as --libexecdir=?
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies