From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | ssuominen@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) | ||
Date: | Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:07:08 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120814160515.315075a9@pomiocik.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) by Samuli Suominen |
1 | On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300 |
2 | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
5 | > > On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
6 | > >> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or |
7 | > >> even /bin. It shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific |
8 | > >> $libdir ,or lib64/. |
9 | > > |
10 | > > Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would be cleaner to |
11 | > > use /usr/libexec. |
12 | > |
13 | > I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff |
14 | > over /usr/lib/$pkg/ on "daily basis" |
15 | |
16 | I believe we should be keeping «aligned» paths somewhere rather than |
17 | randomly moving stuff by hand. If you're saying that /usr/lib/${PN} == |
18 | libexec, maybe we should put that into PMS as --libexecdir=? |
19 | |
20 | -- |
21 | Best regards, |
22 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: multilib-strict no longer in FEATURES of targets/developer/make.defaults (pending on bug 424423) | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |