| 1 |
On 14.08.2012 17:05, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or |
| 8 |
>>>> even /bin. It shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific |
| 9 |
>>>> $libdir ,or lib64/. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would be cleaner to |
| 12 |
>>> use /usr/libexec. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff |
| 15 |
>> over /usr/lib/$pkg/ on "daily basis" |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I believe we should be keeping «aligned» paths somewhere rather than |
| 18 |
> randomly moving stuff by hand. If you're saying that /usr/lib/${PN} == |
| 19 |
> libexec, maybe we should put that into PMS as --libexecdir=? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
With a EAPI bump, of course, to prevent breakage. |
Archives