| 1 |
On Sat, 21 May 2016 20:45:18 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 21 May 2016 17:08, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
| 5 |
> > This function is too generic to be in |
| 6 |
> > rebar.eclass, so I have decided to move it to eutils. What is the |
| 7 |
> > problem with adding it to eutils? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> because no one else is using it or cares about it. we've gotten by |
| 10 |
> for more than 10 years at this point w/out someone asking for this. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Which makes me think of the terribly ugly evar_push which is used only |
| 13 |
by you, as part of bad epatch implementation and one eblit. Yet it is |
| 14 |
in eutils, and from time to time we have to tell our users 'you can do |
| 15 |
things more correctly than using a crappy function that looks like it's |
| 16 |
official'. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
| 21 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives