| 1 |
On 21 May 2016 17:08, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> >> The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in |
| 4 |
> >> src_prepare(). It's easier with awk rather than sed. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > again, provide an example. one or two uncommon use cases doesn't justify |
| 7 |
> > being added to eutils. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> See rebar.eclass review where it is used. Later ejabberd ebuild I'm |
| 10 |
> going to add uses it as well. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
neither of those are terribly compelling and can be written in sed. |
| 13 |
you want to do a match & replace in that just as easily. roughly: |
| 14 |
sed -i \ |
| 15 |
-e '/{[[:space:]]*deps[[:space:]]*,\/,\/}/{s:.*:{deps, []}:}' \ |
| 16 |
foo |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> This function is too generic to be in |
| 19 |
> rebar.eclass, so I have decided to move it to eutils. What is the |
| 20 |
> problem with adding it to eutils? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
because no one else is using it or cares about it. we've gotten by |
| 23 |
for more than 10 years at this point w/out someone asking for this. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
if you really want it in rebar, then just DEPEND on gawk and use the |
| 26 |
inplace flag in your code. then there's no need for eawk anywhere. |
| 27 |
-mike |
Archives