From: | "Amadeusz Żołnowski" <aidecoe@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place | ||
Date: | Sat, 21 May 2016 16:08:57 | ||
Message-Id: | 8737pb5r7b.fsf@freja.aidecoe.name | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place by Mike Frysinger |
1 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
2 | >> The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in |
3 | >> src_prepare(). It's easier with awk rather than sed. |
4 | > |
5 | > again, provide an example. one or two uncommon use cases doesn't justify |
6 | > being added to eutils. |
7 | |
8 | See rebar.eclass review where it is used. Later ejabberd ebuild I'm |
9 | going to add uses it as well. This function is too generic to be in |
10 | rebar.eclass, so I have decided to move it to eutils. What is the |
11 | problem with adding it to eutils? |
12 | |
13 | -- Amadeusz Żołnowski |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place | Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |