| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 09:41 schrieb Simon Stelling: |
| 2 |
> I can't follow, sorry. Sure, the new flag will be 'build against ff instead |
| 3 |
> of seamonkey', but then it's still valid use, no? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
No, we have a flag "seamonkey" (that is already global) that means "build |
| 6 |
against seamonkey", so ff is considered default if that flag is not set. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
This could be discussed, but imho we definitely need a standard for that, that |
| 9 |
means one of them, firefor or seamonkey, has to die. I don't really care |
| 10 |
which one, but it should be the same for the whole tree. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Hanno Böck Blog: http://www.hboeck.de/ |
| 14 |
GPG: 3DBD3B20 Jabber: jabber@××××××.de |
Archives