| 1 |
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng |
| 10 |
> > eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive |
| 11 |
> > replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to |
| 12 |
> > do that efficiently, most of the core functionality should be moved |
| 13 |
> > so that the new distutils is more like a wrapper to the new |
| 14 |
> > python. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, but |
| 17 |
> > mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the |
| 18 |
> > current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> In that case we are missing 95% of the features of python.eclass. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Please list the features. Preferably, order them by usefulness, with |
| 24 |
exact use cases. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Michał Górny |
Archives