1 |
El sáb, 29-09-2012 a las 20:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
2 |
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200 |
3 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
6 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng |
11 |
> > > eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive |
12 |
> > > replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to |
13 |
> > > do that efficiently, most of the core functionality should be moved |
14 |
> > > so that the new distutils is more like a wrapper to the new |
15 |
> > > python. |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, but |
18 |
> > > mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the |
19 |
> > > current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > In that case we are missing 95% of the features of python.eclass. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Please list the features. Preferably, order them by usefulness, with |
25 |
> exact use cases. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
Personally, I usually run: |
29 |
- python_clean_py-compile_files -> Clean py-compile files to disable |
30 |
byte-compilation allowing us to drop all various ways of doing this that |
31 |
were living in the tree some time ago. |
32 |
- python_convert_shebangs -> but, I guess this is handled in a different |
33 |
way in your eclass, no? :/ |