Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Initial python-r1.eclass & distutils-r1.eclass
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:21:55
Message-Id: 1348946400.2200.6.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Initial python-r1.eclass & distutils-r1.eclass by "Michał Górny"
1 El sáb, 29-09-2012 a las 20:40 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
2 > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:45:07 +0200
3 > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
6 > > Hash: SHA1
7 > >
8 > > On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
9 > > >
10 > > > There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng
11 > > > eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive
12 > > > replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to
13 > > > do that efficiently, most of the core functionality should be moved
14 > > > so that the new distutils is more like a wrapper to the new
15 > > > python.
16 > > >
17 > > > This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, but
18 > > > mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the
19 > > > current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it..
20 > > >
21 > >
22 > > In that case we are missing 95% of the features of python.eclass.
23 >
24 > Please list the features. Preferably, order them by usefulness, with
25 > exact use cases.
26 >
27
28 Personally, I usually run:
29 - python_clean_py-compile_files -> Clean py-compile files to disable
30 byte-compilation allowing us to drop all various ways of doing this that
31 were living in the tree some time ago.
32 - python_convert_shebangs -> but, I guess this is handled in a different
33 way in your eclass, no? :/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Initial python-r1.eclass & distutils-r1.eclass "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>