Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, ulm@g.o, bazaar@g.o, robbat2@g.o, arfrever@g.o, nelchael@××××××.ort, cvs-utils@g.o, djc@g.o, ricmm@g.o, gregkh@g.o, haskell@g.o, dev-tools@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for version control
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:26:19
Message-Id: 4B8FDF1B.6030400@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for version control by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 03/04/10 10:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:32:47 +0100
3 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
4 >>>>>>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
5 >>> My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
6 >>> controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
7
8 I like the idea, +1 from me
9
10
11 >> Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
12 >> language and with software configuration management.
13
14 Agreed, "scm" is a bad choice.
15
16
17 > And this is why the move wasn't done five years ago: by the time we'd
18 > worked out everything we'd need to do by hand because epkgmove was
19 > broken, the whole thing got bikeshedded to death.
20
21 So that's a great chance for all of us to prove we can do better this
22 time. We have at least two more names in the pool:
23
24 VCS = version control system/software
25 RCS = revision control system/software
26
27 The former seems more common to me though the second seems prefered in
28 wikipedia:
29 - "Version_control" forwards to "Revision control"
30 - "Comparison of revision control software"
31 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
32
33 I'd still propose "dev-vcs", unless someone spots something bad about it.
34
35
36
37 Sebastian

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: New category for version control Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>