| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:05:43PM +0200, Grobian wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 5 |
> >On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>Bah! No I'm not, because Sven pointed out that it collides with the |
| 7 |
> >>bugzilla resolution. So I'm going with CHECKED instead. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >Whoah! Isn't REVIEWED the perfect keyword? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> or APPROVED? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I think APPROVED doesn't reflect the idea; since nobody 'approved' the |
| 15 |
ebuild. A developer just checked it looks good and 'seems to work'. |
| 16 |
REVIEWED or CHECKED make more sense imho. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers, |
| 19 |
Ferdy |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
\\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be ) |
| 23 |
o o ( FREE ) |
| 24 |
+--ooO--O--Ooo-----------------------------------------------+ |
| 25 |
| Fernando José Pereda Garcimartín - http://www.ferdyx.org | |
| 26 |
| Gentoo Linux Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy | |
| 27 |
| [ ferdy AT ferdyx DOT org ] && [ ferdy AT gentoo DOT org ] | |
| 28 |
| 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 | |
| 29 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+ |
Archives