| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 5 |
> I think APPROVED doesn't reflect the idea; since nobody 'approved' the |
| 6 |
> ebuild. A developer just checked it looks good and 'seems to work'. |
| 7 |
> REVIEWED or CHECKED make more sense imho. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I like REVIEWED; it seems to reflect the intended meaning. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
And I'm please that Ciaran is promoting peer review of ebuilds. Now if |
| 13 |
we can just get him off the idea that dev submitted stuff is 'correct by |
| 14 |
default' we'll be getting somewhere in terms of QA. ;) |
| 15 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
iD8DBQFDBSZG2QTTR4CNEQARAsYTAJ9slITUxSB8PovswA5MShV36uP1xwCfRnZB |
| 19 |
s464221vXli1LtlwKVtS+c8= |
| 20 |
=4POr |
| 21 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives